Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

Golden shares: a tarnished solution that smacks of protectionism

State shares take a toll in terms of performance and free markets

State-held shares are back on the agenda. Popular during Europe’s wave of privatisation in the 1970s and 80s, so called golden shares — spezialaktie in Germany — allowed governments to wield control over a slew of public companies including utilities and oil and gas majors. By far the bulk had been redeemed by the turn of the millennium.

With globalisation in retreat and protectionism firmly re-ensconced, British politicians are hoping to spark a revival. The defence committee wants them reinstated across defence companies, irked at US private equity owned Cobham’s $3.6bn bid for Ultra Electronics. More speciously, MP Tom Tugendhat is angling for a government share — and a 25.1 per cent stake — in Arm, the chip designer, which owner SoftBank plans to list in New York after its planned $40bn sale to Nvidia collapsed. Echoing Washington and Beijing, he argues that national security is part and parcel of technological leadership.

State shares, like those held by tech founders, take a toll in terms of performance and free markets. An asymmetric veto on takeovers deprives other shareholders of the opportunity to sell; a particular handicap in the UK’s M&A-heavy market. Take the redemption of golden shares in water and electricity utilities in the mid-1990s. To the dismay of politicians, this unleashed a flurry of bids and within two years all but one of the 12 regional electricity companies had been flogged.

The European Commission, more concerned at the impediment to the free flow of capital, was largely successful in stamping them out although holdouts — especially in the UK — remain. These include BAE and Rolls-Royce, both of which operate defence capabilities.

There is a case to be made for government vetoes when it comes to national security. Golden shares also have a use elsewhere, such as fostering environmental or social missions. The Thomson family’s founders’ share in Thomson Reuters, designed to safeguard independence and lack of bias in reporting, also makes sense. Slapping similar government rights on to tech companies does not.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

英国考虑对顶尖全球人才免收签证费用

首相的团队希望让英国更易于吸引就读过名校的人才,而美国政府正急剧转向相反方向。

日本自民党生存之战:首位女首相还是最年轻领袖?

自民党投票将在保守派高市早苗与更自由派的小泉进次郎之间展开角逐

Lex专栏:英国“僵尸”大学急需改革

英国大学是时候向企业借鉴了,有时“创造性破坏”也是一件好事。

一周展望:美国通胀会比就业更重要吗?

美国将公布美联储偏好的个人消费支出通胀指标;英国投资者本周关注标普全球的9月采购经理人指数初值;瑞士央行将做出利率决策。

走向绿色:抹茶狂潮席卷英国咖啡馆

日式茶饮因健康功效与社交媒体上的“颜值”而走俏。

内塔尼亚胡会正式吞并西岸地区吗?

以色列总理面临来自极右翼联合政府伙伴的压力,要求正式吞并部分被占领的巴勒斯坦领土。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×